Skip to main content

Review: CrazyTalk Animator 3 vs Moho Studio Pro 12

Reallusion's CrazyTalk Animator 3 or Smith Micro's Moho Studio Pro 12. Which of these 2D animation applications is right for you?

Regular readers of this blog will know I'm a strong supporter, and fairly proficient user of CrazyTalk Animator since version 1. It's a great piece of software for producing 2D animations from purchased content quickly and, with version 3, is easier than ever to create animations from your own art.

Lesser known is that I first purchased Moho Studio Pro 12 (then known as Anime Studio Pro 9) back in October of 2012 and have been upgrading it to the latest version ever since because I believed in it as an application for creating great 2D animation to TV quality standard. As such, it's a much more complex application than CTA3 that I only got around to learning properly late last year. I'm still in the process of blogging my progress.

Despite this I feel I've learned enough of Moho to compare it to CTA3 to help you determine which application may be suited to your needs.

What Type of Animation Are They Suited To?

CrazyTalk Animator 3, 2D Human Puppet
Template and example character.
Both applications excel at 2D, puppet style, character animation and 2D motion graphics. Moho has some additional ability to animate 3D objects and 3D character rigs but 3D is really included to compliment and enhance your 2D animation with 3D elements.

If you're looking specifically for frame by frame, hand drawn animation then neither of these applications are really suited to that style. Moho has vector drawing tools to help create finished hand drawn animation but isn't good for drawing initial roughs. CTA3 can handle frame by frame animation through sprite swapping but uses this ability mainly for animating detailed items like hands and faces.

What Version Should You Buy?

Both CTA3 and Moho are sold in different versions. If you're a complete animation beginner and aren't ready to invest too much, you might want to consider the lower costing CTA3 Standard or Pro. With Moho you might consider the Debut version.

Be aware that these cheaper versions remove some of the advanced features of the full versions (CTA3 Pipeline and Moho Studio Pro). I've seen many people complain that it would have been more cost effective to purchase the full software initially than pay the additional price to upgrade to the full version.

My recommendation, if you know you're serious about animation and can afford the full versions, then buy them. You'll get the full experience of the software and will never watch a video tutorial only to discover that feature isn't in your version.

Both applications offer free trials so make the most of those before you buy. I wouldn't recommend downloading them at the same time, there's just too much to learn. Trial them one after the other.

This comparison is based on the full versions of each application.

Which One is Easier to Learn?

User Interface Comparison
Top: CrazyTalk Animator 3
Bottom: Moho Studio Pro 12
An initial comparison of CTA3's user interface (UI) to Moho 12 reveals that CTA3's is much less intimidating with fewer tools and settings initially onscreen.

CTA3's UI remains fairly constant with tools grayed out if they aren't appropriate to the current selection on the stage. Fly-out hints appear for most tools if you mouse over them.

Moho's tool menu changes quite a bit with different tools coming and going based on what is selected on the stage. Moho has fly-out tool hints but also includes a hint bar, under the settings menu bar that further details how the currently selected tool is used.

Both applications feature comprehensive, written user manuals (available through their Help menus). You'll also find many video tutorials, created by each company, to help you learn, however both companies could use an online video tutorial link from their application's help menu that is a direct step by step video guide to learning the software (videos that logically progress and gradually introduce you to the more advanced features). For some reason both companies focus on explaining their software's newest features and forget that not everyone is upgrading. New users tend to have to sort through the tutorial videos to find what they need.

Overall CTA3 is the easiest to learn by virtue of the fact there is less to learn and you can get through the basics much quicker. Further to that, CTA3's content library (even if you just settle for what comes with the application) will have you animating much quicker. Predefined content, motions and auto lip syncing make getting your first test animations up and running a much simpler process.

Moho does ship with some demo content that you can make use of (and you can buy content packs) but generally the process of animating is more detailed and intricate - giving you greater control but making it more time consuming to master the basics.

Content Creation Sources

Reallusion's Content Developer Marketplace.
Both CTA3 and Moho allow you to animate with pre-made content that you can either purchase directly through each company's online stores or through their respective, user generated, market places. Reallusion's Content Store and Content Marketplace is easy to find through links directly from the application's Help Menu. I had to do some digging to discover a link to Smith Micro's Content Paradise Market Place from within their Online Store (which is also has a link from the application's Help menu).

Both applications include character creation/composer tools where you can build custom characters using existing assets you already have. I personally prefer CTA3's character composer as it really draws on any available content you have in your library. Moho's character composer seems to limit you to a particular drawing style. Moho's creator also includes a random character generator feature that I found resulted in characters so garish and awkward they were more laughable than useful.

Moho's Vector Drawing and
Bone Rigging Tools.
Creating animations from your own artwork is very possible with both applications though, at minimum, you will need a drawing application that can export to transparent PNG and JPG image file formats.

Moho's vector drawing tools allow you to trace all your artwork into vectors right within the application. It even includes a handy, auto-trace tool that works reasonably well. CTA3 has support for vector art as .SWF files but you'll need vector illustration software that can export in this format.

Character Creation and Bones

2D puppet animation is built on manipulating character bone rigs. Any talk about ease of character creation from your own character designs comes down to how easy is it to rig your characters with a bone rig.

Moho's bone rigging system is incredibly advanced and flexible in application. You can use it to rig characters of any size or shape. If you can dream it in 2D then Moho's bone rigging system can make it move exactly how you want. You can even add bone switches and levers to manipulate bones indirectly. All this comes with the price of a fairly steep learning curve.

An example of Moho's complex bone rigging capability on this bug creature
found in Moho's Project Sample Library titled CK Crustacea.

CTA3 with its new G3 freebone character rigs will also effectively let you rig almost any 2D character art you can imagine using a similar bone rigging system to Moho but with a much simpler and easier to learn implementation.

CrazyTalk Animator 3's Animal Templates
featuring Cats, Dogs and Horses.
On top of this you can build your characters around specific G3 character templates for humans, cats, dogs and horses. This allows your characters to be animated with predefined motions from your motion library and also makes them compatible with CTA3's direct puppet facial animation system too (a process that allows you to directly record your character moving in real time).

G3 characters in CTA3 are relatively easy to rig. Once you have all your artwork ready, putting together a basic rig can be done in less than an hour. A full character rig with switchable hand and facial sprites will take longer but it's not that difficult to learn.

CrazyTalk Animator 3's Facial
Morph Animation System.
Unique to CTA3 is its G2 plus (bipedal only) characters, which simulate 3D movement in a 2D environment, and makes use of the new facial morph, face animation system of G3 characters. In action these characters are quite impressive and can even be animated using 3D imotions from iClone however, creating a G2 character comes with a very steep learning curve and is extremely time consuming. If G2 characters sound like an attractive option be sure to purchase the Pipeline version of CTA3 which has tools to make the creation process a touch easier and quicker.

Creating Your Animations

Other than the lip syncing all of the animation in this
clip was key framed from scratch in CrazyTalk Animator.
CTA3 is specifically designed to speed up the actual animation process. Whilst you can key frame every little movement from scratch a lot of time and effort can be saved using the predefined motion libraries and puppet animation tools.

Block out motion sequences using combinations of library motions then refine them to suit your exact needs. Create motions from scratch, save them out and transfer them to other characters. Create action menus for your characters containing often used actions (and perform motions that can even include the character's voice track).

Lip syncing is as simple as loading in a voice audio file into your character and CTA3 does the rest. It's pretty good too but, if your character's mouth movements don't quite look right it's easy enough to refine with the lips editor.

In this latest release, CTA3 introduced elastic motions for props, making it easy to add cartoon effects like squash and stretch to your motion graphics simply by drag'n'dropping the desired effect onto your prop.

The majority of CTA3's animation can be done using point, drag and click motions of your mouse or track pad combined with keyboard short cuts.

In contrast, I've been learning Moho's animation tools for quite some time, completing well over 30-40 video tutorials... I've heard you can import and export motion files with Moho 12 (it's listed as a new feature) but I've yet to be shown how and have no idea where to start. So far all of the character animation I've done has been key framed from scratch.

All of the animation in this clip was key framed from scratch
in Moho Pro 12. The funky, liquid background and 3D shading
on the character are advanced Moho visual effects that can be
applied in seconds to give animations a whole new look.
Moho does feature automatic lip syncing that is a little easier to set up on a custom character compared to CTA3 however CTA3's facial deformation animation system gives your mouth sprites considerably more range of movement and expression. Moho could probably match and even surpass CTA3's facial animation system but, in doing so, its set up becomes much more complex and time consuming.

As far as motion graphics go I would say Moho is on par with CTA3 but doesn't have quite the ease of use that elastic motions bring to the table. That said, CTA3 has no physics or particle animation support, nor does it have Moho's animated effects for layers such as shadows, 3D shadows and shading.

Both applications have the ability to create a 3D parallax effect (multi-layer planes) by being able to places items nearer or further away from the camera. Moho takes this a step further by being able to rotate 2D objects around the Z plane (i.e. tilt 2D images towards or away from the camera).

Is CrazyTalk Animator 3 Enough or Should I buy Moho 12?

CrazyTalk Animator 3 has yet to be proven as a serious 2D animation studio (I'm not aware of any major animation studios using it to create their shows). It has impressive features, many of which are unique to the application but it's still a relatively new player. In it's favor is ease of use, time saving motion libraries (including elastic motions) and its easier to learn bone rigging and facial distortion animation systems.

The quality of the animation produced is mostly determined by the skill of the animator as there is nothing here to prevent you from producing professional quality animations. It does lack many of the advanced visual and style effects found in Moho but this isn't an issue if you're not doing anything complex enough to need them.

Elastic motions are such a nice, new addition to version 3 that, if motion graphics or animated explainer videos is your thing, these are going to really bring your images alive easily and quickly.

Personally I find CTA3 the ideal animation tool for producing animation quickly with a team of one (i.e. just me). If you're planning on creating an animated web series then CTA3 is going to save you a lot of time and allow you to focus more on telling the story.

As I said at the outset I believe in Moho as a tool that can produce TV quality animation. It's advanced character rigging allows for extremely complex, multi-angle rigs. If you need proof, Moho Pro 12 is the backbone animation tool of the acclaimed children's TV show Puffin Rock created by Cartoon Saloon. It is used to create all the animation and character rigs of the show (which you can read about in detail on SmithMicro's Blog).

Watch the video below of Jeremy Purcell, Assistant Director of Puffin Rock demonstrating the lead character's rig and animation.

Moho's advanced drawing tools means it's also possible to use it in the creation of final artwork for backgrounds and props. You really only need additional drawing software to plan and create your initial designs for importing and tracing as vectors inside Moho.

Overall, Moho Pro is a much more powerful application with features to rival higher end animation tools at a more affordable price for anyone to use, professional or otherwise.

The latest version includes features I've not mentioned here, simply because I've yet to learn or even come across them in the software's video tutorial series. (Mesh warping animation is one such new feature that springs to mind).

There in lies the difference between CTA3 and Moho Pro 12. CTA 3 is easier to learn and will have you animating your own creations much sooner. You'll master the majority of the program much quicker and find it easier to retain how to use even those features you don't use a lot in your work.

Moho Pro 12 is packed full of features, is extremely flexible but at the cost of being much harder and more time consuming to learn. You'll spend a lot of time relearning how things are done before you get to any kind of proficiency with the software (speaking from personal experience here).

It'll handle anything that CTA3 can do and more but the set up will be a little longer and more involved. You can certainly use it for creating animations quickly but if speed is an issue CTA3 may have the edge.

The good thing about both of these application is the affordable price. It's not impossible to have both in your toolbox and use whichever one is really suited to your current project (as noted at the top of this article I've had the latest versions of both for years).

If you're new to animation software, and just want to get up and running quickly, start out with CTA3. It's feature set is deep enough that you're not going to out grow or feel limited by what it can do in the short to medium term. It's an ideal tool if you're short on time but still want to produce quality, puppet style, 2D animation or animated explainer videos using motion graphics etc.

If you're not as thrown by a steep learning curve and need more flexibility and visual design choices than CTA3 has to offer, Moho is worth the time you'll need to learn it. It's a much bigger tool box that will give you many more options for experimentation with visual style. An advanced animation tool that, once you know it well, you may never want to use anything else (if you haven't given up on learning it... can you tell I'm struggling sticking with it even though I believe in the application?).

Hopefully I've given you something to think about in making your own decision. The applications themselves are in two different places. Moho is a more mature program at version 12 where as CTA3 is still evolving to catch up in features. CTA3 has some way to go but where it is now makes it a formidable animation studio that can certainly handle most of your 2D animation needs.

- Post supported by Reallusion.

Popular posts from this blog

AE Juice - Animation Presets, Motion Graphics, Templates, Transitions for After Effects, Premiere Pro, and Other Video Applications

Level up you video edits and animations with AE Juice's motion graphics and templates. Some days you just don't have the time to create flashy motion graphics for your latest video or animation. For some of us it's more a question of our own artistic abilities being a little less than the awesome we'd like them to be. Whatever reason a resource like AE Juice's animation presets, motion graphics, templates, and transitions packs for After Effects , Premiere Pro , and other video applications can really make your work stand out very quickly. AE Juice gives you access to an instant library of free, premade content elements and sound effects, which you can add to with additional purchases of various themed packs from their store. There are three ways to manage their content, all of which can be used in commercial projects . The AE Juice Standalone Package Manager makes it easy to browse previews of all your pack contents and to download and find just the elements yo

Should You Buy or Upgrade to MOHO 13? *Spoiler* Yes. Yes You Should!

MOHO 13's New Character Set. Smith Micro released MOHO 13 , their all in one, 2D animation studio, this week. The question is should you buy or upgrade to the latest version? Obviously I've already spoiled this in the title, so the actual question is why do I think you should buy or upgrade? To be clear, I'm only talking about MOHO 13 Pro. If you're considering MOHO 13 Debut be aware that you're missing out on some of the new features, and a lot of existing features that are only available in the Pro version. Debut is fine if the budget doesn't stretch to Pro, but, if you never want to be disappointed about not having a feature, it's Pro or nothing! The other thing I need to be transparent about is I'm not, by any stretch, a frequent MOHO user/animator. However I took the time to learn MOHO 12 Pro fairly extensively, blogging about my process and sorting out 104 free MOHO training videos into a logical viewing order in the process. I think I ha

TimeBolt: Fast Video Editing for Anyone Creating Online Courses, Podcasts, or Vlogs.

I resisted making tutorial videos for a long time because I don't like editing. Specifically I don't like editing me teaching as I step students through a process during a screen record. I have a tendency to insert long pauses not just in the middle of sentences but between multiple words in the middle of sentences as my pace matches what I'm doing onscreen. This makes for very long and very slow paced video tutorials. To counteract this I have to edit out all the pauses. This can take hours, or even days on particularly long tutorials. For example, when I created my main course, The Lazy Animator Beginner's Guide to Cartoon Animator , I literally injured the thumb on my right hand, operating my mouse, as I spent weeks taking out all my pauses (seriously, I had to wear a thumb brace for a few weeks to fix the pain). Recently I came across TimeBolt , a very affordable, fast editing application with the featured purpose of removing all the pauses from your video (and even

Make Disney/Pixar Style Characters with Reallusion's Character Creator and Toon Figure Bases

The Extraordinary Tourist Classic Coat outfit created using Reallusion's Toon Designer for CC3. I've talked before how I've wanted to get into 3D Disney/Pixar style character animation since I first saw the animated cutscenes for the very first Tomb Raider game back in 1996. It's why I initially bought Reallusion's iClone 3D studio app as soon as I could afford a computer that would run it. But then Reallusion released their 3D Character Creator (CC) for iClone and I wanted to create my characters with that (and I did try with Bat Storm ). But the focus of CC was realism, even with ToKoMotion's stylised body morphs . Now with Reallusion's Cartoon Designer bundle for CC3 which features two packs, Toon Figures , and Toon Hair , designing Disney/Pixar style 3D characters just got a whole lot quicker. The two packs are the bare essentials for creating Toon style characters. Five body morphs (2 male, 2 female, and one adolescent body morph that w

Can You Learn Reallusion's Cartoon Animator 5 for Free Using Their 137 Official YouTube Video Tutorials Sorted Into a Logical Learning Order?

Or you could just buy The Lazy Animator Beginner's Guide to Cartoon Animator . While Reallusion's Cartoon Animator is one of the easiest 2D animation studios to get up and running with quickly, learning it from all of the official, free, video tutorials can be more overwhelming than helpful. With more than 137 videos totaling more than 28 and a half hours of tutorials, spread across three generations of the software (Cartoon Animator 3 through 5) it's hard to know if what you're learning is a current or legacy feature that you either need to know or can be skipped. Many of the official tutorials only teach specific features of the software and don't relate at all to previous or later tutorials. As a result there are many features either not mentioned or are hard to find. To make your learning easier, on this page, I've collected together all of the essential, official, free video tutorials and sorted them into a learning order that makes sense. Simply start at

Creating a G3-360 Head From a Single Photo in Reallusion's Cartoon Animator

Source Photo from Generated Photos . Ever since Reallusion introduced the G3-360 Character Head into Cartoon Animator 4 I've wanted to see if their 360 Head Creator tool could be used to create an animated head using a photo. Part of the reason I've never given this a shot, until now, is that I just assumed it would be difficult, and require a lot of photo editing to blend out the sprite edges. It turns out, creating a photographic G3-360 head is not that much more difficult than creating a cartoon head, and can be done using a single photographic image using my own G3-360 head rigging system . While this article isn't intended to be a full tutorial, I'll run through the basic steps of how I achieved my photographic G3-360 head, shown in the comparison below, of a Cartoon Animator Morph-based head on the left, and my G3-360 head on the right. Pros and Cons Cartoon Animator's morph-based head system is ideal for animating photographic faces. It uses a semi 3D wire me