Skip to main content

Which Animation App is 'Professional' and What Does 'Professional' Mean to You?

What's the Best Animation Tool?
There is an ongoing debate in animation circles about what animation tools are considered 'Professional' and capable of producing 'Professional Quality' animation? Can only tools with the status of 'Industry Standard' be considered professional and by extension be the only tools that can produce professional quality animation?

Is it the target market of an animation tool that makes it professional? Is it the skill of the person using it that determines whether a tool is capable of professional quality output or the specs of the app?

What Animation Tool Should You Learn?

In a discussion in the Cartoon Animator Users Facebook group a member noted that they had been learning Cartoon Animator (CA4) for four months, only to find out that the application isn't used by professional animators (based on asking 30 professionals on LinkedIn). The consensus was that learning Toon Boom Harmony or MOHO was the better option because both those applications have track records for producing animation for TV and Cinema. The implication was that learning Cartoon Animator had been a waste of time.

A secondary part of the question was incorrectly thinking that you needed to buy hundreds of dollars worth of assets to do professional work with Cartoon Animator, where as with Toon Boom and MOHO you don't need to buy any assets. The people who create professional content for you to buy for CA4 don't have to buy anything to create professional quality animations, therefore, logically, if you can produce professional quality art yourself, then you don't need to buy any assets either.

(Not to mention MOHO also has its own content pack addons you can buy if you can't draw, and Toon Boom... well their business model is a subscription service to the app, so you're going to need professional quality art skills to get professional quality results).

The Better Question: What Does Being an Animator Mean to You?

Back to the first questions about what makes an app 'professional' and what app is for 'professional quality' animation?

Reallusion Content Developer and two time winner of Reallusion's Animation@Work Competition, Francesco Tammaccaro, also known as Frank's Pencil, gave a very detailed response that reads like a tour through some of the leading animation apps used in the industry, and how Cartoon Animator measures up alongside them.

He also specifically addressed what it means to be professional, and what actually matters when it comes to professional quality output. I was so impressed with his answer I asked if I could reproduce it here in full. Thankfully he said yes.
Francesco Tammaccaro: The "professional" tag is something I'd like to discuss in depth. Trusting the internet about what's the "best" software is something that personally made me WASTE many years in my 20s and almost made me give up on animation, so please, be very careful when you interpret that advice.

The right tool for you is the one that takes you where you need to go, according to your skills, time and money. Is as easy and complex as this.

First and foremost, we need to define "professional". I think that the creators of South Park, Happy Tree Friends, Peppa Pig and the major youtube animation channels with millions of subs are all professionals, regardless of my personal taste.

Creating the Peppa Pig series is a different beast than the Rick and Morty or South Park series. Yet, they are all extremely successful productions.

Each episode of South Park, for instance, is produced within a week, focusing mostly on the storytelling, drawing and animating as fast as possible (using corel draw and Maya). Rick and morty, instead, focuses a lot on visual quality, it has a good size team of animators and illustrators that use Toon Boom. Peppa Pig was very time consuming during the pre-production phase, where all the assets where produced. After that, each episode is completed very fast, reusing the same assets in CelAction.

Before picking your software, you need to ask yourself very carefully (and do it, please guys, don't do the same mistake I did) what does it mean for you to be an animator.

Do you want to create beautiful disney-like animation and you HOPE YOU GET HIRED IN A STUDIO? You want your work to be seen by recruiters and they maybe can offer you a junior position somewhere, in a super-high competition and low paid industry? You want to focus more on the visual style and NOT on the storytelling? Pick Toon Boom. It's a software designed for big animation studios. Offers a lot of possibilities, bulky, heavy. Feels like driving a plane. Wanna get to the other side of the world and look cool? Toon Boom man. Not so useful if you are a lone wolf tho. Would you move around your city with a plane?

You don't know what you want to do at all and you just want to mess around, but you want your friends to perceive you as a Pro? Pick Flash. We all know flash. Tons of youtube channels use flash to make tons of $. Oh, and another tiny thing: so, so many successful shows that now use Toon Boom and all the other "professhiional" stuff, were born as crappy flash animations (please read the last sentence a couple of times 💓).

You like a more modern, fast and smart way of animating? Bones, rigs, real-time rendering, props and animation libraries? Pick Moho! But just if what you want to do is focus on experimental visual shots or indulge in some over-complicated rig-automated mess, and pretend you enjoy drawing with those messy drawing tools. (sorry Moho users).

If you like the Moho concept but you actually want to get an animation done from start to finish, pick Cartoon Animator 4. In my opinion, it's like Moho with a many, many limitations, but the important juice is there. And you get stuff done.

My 2 cents here. But again, please ask yourself one more time "what does it mean to be a professional animator" for you. I generate income from my art, and I'm right now investing time in learning Rough Animator, cause I want to create an entire animation on the iPad.

I leave you with an annoying question: do you think a recruiter would be more willing to offer a Toon Boom job to someone that created many good videos with CA4, or someone that started but never finished any projects on Toon Boom?
Hint on that final question, it's the first option most of the time.

If your take away from this article is "I need to learn Toon Boom or MOHO" to be a professional animator then check out these blog posts on my experiences of trying to learn Toon Boom here, and MOHO Here. Neither post is meant to discourage you but they will give you some idea of what you're up against in terms of the learning curve.

I'm very much in agreeance with Francesco. I choose Cartoon Animator 4 (which was known as CrazyTalk Animator when I first discovered it) because it is the ideal tool for lone, independent animators, who need to produce content quickly.

It never once crossed my mind about whether CA4 is considered a professional tool or capable of professional output. It met my needs and I know professional output hinges entirely on the person using it.

The best Animation Tool is the One You Like to Use the Most

That said, what's right for me, may not be right for you. I've tried a lot of different animation tools and I can tell you, the best tool is the one you like to use the most. You'll do your best work in that application.

At the same time I discovered CA4 I also discovered MOHO, and always kept my license current. I was sure it was a great tool for animation if I could just get around to learning it. When I finally did learn it, I discovered it's an amazing tool for animation (so amazing that I'm still considering upgrading my license to the latest version even though I probably won't use it) but it's filled with features I don't need, and I just didn't enjoy using it.

However, if I had enjoyed it, I'm certain I would've become proficient with it, and probably left CA4 by the wayside because, just look at everything MOHO can do that CA4 can't.

Anyway, this thought piece has become far longer than intended. The bottom line for me is use what animation tool works for you. It may not get you a studio job but there's so much opportunity for freelance web animators out there.

There are literally thousands upon thousands of Youtube businesses out there that won't care at all what application you're using to make their super cool animations with.

Even cooler, why not make your own animated series and pitch it to a network?


Related Udemy Affiliate Links

Comments

  1. Great article. And I’ve found the same experience to be true for me, wish I’d liked Toon Boom and Moho, but I’m storyteller more than a tech person. CA4 was the best of the bunch for me for that reason.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Thanks for sharing. I'm the same. I'm more into telling a good story and, while I still want the animation to look good, I don't want to spend so much time and energy on it that it limits the time I have for new stories.

      Toon Boom and Moho are both amazing studios but they are too complex for me.

      Delete
  2. Amazing article thank you, i was feeling happiness when i was reading your article, it is very important and meaningful article

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

* Thanks to constant spam comments by a Casino Marketing Moron who won't get the message that spam comments WILL be deleted ALL comments will be moderated and only cool, on topic comments will be approved.

I welcome, read, and respond to genuine comments relating to each post. If your comment isn't that save me some time by not posting it.

Popular posts from this blog

Featured Animator: Christian Haynes - 'Zack In Time' An Original, Independent, Animated Series on the Rise

Christian Haynes - Zack In Time.  If you've ever wanted to create an animated TV series staring your own original characters and stories then Los Angeles based writer, director, and animator, Christian Haynes is taking those next steps of putting together a team, developing a pitch/trailer for their series, Zack In Time. Featuring professional studio quality animation, they hope the show will get picked up by an animation studio for an official series. The path he and his team are taking is one you could easily follow as they deal with real life commitments, and building a following on Instagram and Tik-Tok showcasing their work behind the scenes. TET: Tell me a little about yourself. Who you are, and why you started animating? My name is Christian Haynes and I've loved animation ever since I was a kid. I would constantly be drawing cartoon characters from TV shows and movies and making my own little homemade comic strips.  As I got older, I became a lot more interested in st

Wonder Unit Storyboarder - Free Storyboarding Software for People Who Can (or Can't) Draw

Wonder Unit Storyboarder.  As an independent and solo animator I'm always tempted to try and skip storyboarding my animated shorts because they're usually only single scene sketch comedy type jokes. As a result I have many unfinished projects that kind of petered out due to having no clear finishing line. Storyboarding your productions, no matter how small, gives you a step by step guide of every shot that needs to be completed (no planning shots as you animate). It also allows you to create an animatic that gives you a rough preview of the finished production. In short, you shouldn't skip storyboards as they, generally, increase the chance of the project being completed. Disclaimer - I'm Not a Fan of Storyboarder Upfront, Wonder Unit's Storyboarder  is not my preferred storyboarding software. However it's completely free, has a number of very compelling featu

Shotcut - Free Open Source Video Editor for Windows, Mac, and Linux

Shotcut Open Source Video Editor. I've been on the hunt for a while now for the best, free, open source, video editing application out there. In Shotcut , by Meltytech , which has versions for Windows, Mac, and Linux, I think I may have found a real front runner. This won't be a feature filled review, rather it will be my first impressions after having used Shotcut on a few of my YouTube videos so far. One of my key criteria for a video editor is the ability to import any video format directly into the project. This may seem like an odd focus initially but having convert video to something your video editor can use is annoyingly time consuming, and it creates a new generation of footage, potentially with a loss in quality if you don't really know much about video format specs (that's this guy right here!). Shotcut will happily work with my OBS recordings (.FLV), and .MOV, .MP4 files that I get from two different cameras. Not only that but Shotcut doesn't hold me up

How to Use Plask and Reallusion's 3DXchange to Create Full Body 3D Motion Capture Animation for Cartoon Animator

Last month I reviewed Plask , a free, browser based app that allows you to create 3D motion capture files for animation from a webcam or prerecorded video footage. At the time my hope was that Plask could be used to create 3D motion capture files for Cartoon Animator 4. Unfortunately my knowledge of how to export 3D animation motion files between applications is fairly basic and I wasn't able to figure it out. However, thanks to 3D animation enthusiast and game developer, Freedom (of the YouTube Channel Freedom Arts ), who published a tutorial on how to use Plask with iClone7 characters (in my review I wasn't able to work that out either) there is now a workflow from Plask, via Reallusion's  3DXchange , to Cartoon Animator that is relatively easy to follow and works well. Note: If you want to try this out, 3DXchange is available as a free 30 day trial download if you don't have it. Creating Your 3D Motion Capture File in Plask I'm not going to do a detailed run

Create 2D Animated Characters with 3D Character Creator Tools and Artistic Filters

3D CC3 TET Character, based on my Oppa Doll Avatar, used as the base for a 2D CA4 character. One of my favorite things to do is to create characters with any type of Avatar/Character creator app. In fact the first test I usually try with these tools is, can I make an avatar of me (or at least my The Extraordinary Tourist persona). Previously I've used 2D character creators like Oppa Doll as a source of artwork for some characters I've made for Reallusion's Cartoon Animator 4 animation studio but 2D character creators are limited to... well 2D. 3D Character Creators While you may think 3D character creators have no place in creating characters for 2D animation there are quite a number of advantages including: No drawing skills required. Render characters in any style. Use an art filter or even hand trace into line art. Need to animate the character in a specific pose or angle? Render out an image of the character in the required angle and animate it in 2D. Quicker to crea

KIT Scenarist - Free, Open Source, Screenwriting Software that Helps Research Your Ideas Too

KIT Scenarist Script Writing Software's Mascot, Alexander Cat. While you can write a script in any word processing app, if you're writing stories (screenplays) that feature characters and dialogue, a dedicated script writing app can save a lot of time formatting, letting you focus more on the actual story. Script writing apps are also very useful if you plan to send your screenplays out to production companies, or if you're collaborating with actors and other production people, who are used to scripts being in a particular standard format.  [Note: In case you're wondering there are reasons scripts follow a standard format and are always written in Courier (typewriter) font, including but not limited to; being easy to read by actors, plenty of space for notes, and the general rule that one page of a script (in this format) equals approximately one minute of screen time.] KIT Scenarist , in my opinion, is one of the best script writing apps out there for ease of use, simp

Creating a G3-360 Head From a Single Photo in Reallusion's Cartoon Animator

Source Photo from Generated Photos . Ever since Reallusion introduced the G3-360 Character Head into Cartoon Animator 4 I've wanted to see if their 360 Head Creator tool could be used to create an animated head using a photo. Part of the reason I've never given this a shot, until now, is that I just assumed it would be difficult, and require a lot of photo editing to blend out the sprite edges. It turns out, creating a photographic G3-360 head is not that much more difficult than creating a cartoon head, and can be done using a single photographic image using my own G3-360 head rigging system . While this article isn't intended to be a full tutorial, I'll run through the basic steps of how I achieved my photographic G3-360 head, shown in the comparison below, of a Cartoon Animator Morph-based head on the left, and my G3-360 head on the right. Pros and Cons Cartoon Animator's morph-based head system is ideal for animating photographic faces. It uses a semi 3D wire me