Skip to main content

Plotagon - Story Telling for Everyone... not really.

Plotagon's Jane
Character.
I've briefly reviewed Plotagon's Animation Tool before as part of my Six DIY Animation tools post and wasn't very impressed. At the time I hadn't really looked very deep into what Plotagon could do. Now that I have had further chance to really explore the software I can safely say that Plotagon will likely be frustrating for anyone with any film training at all.

I say that because, even if you'd had the most basic training in the art of film making, Plotagon is going to frustrate you with it's rigid placement of actors locked camera choices and step by step interpretation of your script.

But let's back up a bit and look at what Plotagon is attempting to do. Plotagon simplifies the film making process by linking what happens in your movie directly to the act of writing your script.

Fig 1. Plotagon Script Interface.
Scripts are set out pretty much in the standard screen writing format. Choose a scene, place up to two characters at any of the predefined locations within the scene and start writing your dialogue. Add character movements, actions and expressions, as well as sound effects and music simply by inserting typical stage directions within your script (see image, Fig 1).

It's a great idea but for an application that runs locally on my computer it's very slow. I'm not the fastest at touch typing but even I can out type the screen cursor by several words. Combine that with having to use the mouse or track pad to select which character is talking and their mood, script writing becomes a slow affair.

Writing could be sped up dramatically, with the flow of ideas left unbroken,` if predictive text was built in to select characters, actions, emotions etc. Pretty much the way dedicated script writing software does. If just this aspect of the software was improved Plotagon would be a really fun tool for story tellers.

On the film making side of things, below is a single scene comedy sketch I wrote, brought to life by Plotagon's 3D actors. Monty Python fans may spot my inspiration as being The Cheese Shop sketch. Unfortunately I don't know as much about coffee as they did about cheese.



As you can see from the video it's not going to win any acting or film making awards but the results are okay given the limitations.

I tried to give the characters appropriate emotions and actions to suit the dialogue. It's not perfect but it kind of works.

What's frustrating though is that for each scene, there are only a handful of locations characters can be placed. If more than one character is in a scene (with a max of two characters per scene) the characters always face each other, even if they're not in the same location.

There is no option to choose camera angles. You're stuck with the supposedly 'professional' film making shots selected by the software based on the action and dialogue. Some of these camera angles are questionable whilst others become repetitive (the over the shoulder shot is definitely over used).

Whilst there are sound effects for actions like opening and closing of doors there are no actual character actions for this. In fact none of the scenes I tried allowed you to have a character exit or enter a scene. It's also very hard to suggest it  'off camera' with a door sound effect because as soon as a character is placed into a scene the camera includes them in most shots.

Videos could easily be improved by giving people more choice on which camera shot they want to use. For example, if I want the camera to frame the non speaking character in a scene to show their reaction to what is being said, then that should be an option.

The limitation of only two characters per scene is also an issue because it makes scenes, such as my coffee shop, appear to be something of a ghost town. In the opening wide shot you'll notice the shop is completely devoid of any other customers.

Plotagon's studio comes with one City theme that includes 5 characters and 6 scenes. You can also purchase additional themes (of which there are presently only four) including Stan Lee's Superheroes, Pride and Prejudice, Alice in Wonderland and a Christmas theme.  Once you've purchased a theme you can mix characters with any themes you already own. There is no ability to import your own scenes, props or characters. You can't customize existing characters either.

The software, at 950MB to download, is far too big for what it does. At that kind of size it should be exceptional but it feels clunky, slow and very much like bloatware. However if it were to be improved so that it performed quicker and in a more streamlined capacity that better suits writers I wouldn't give the download size a second thought.

Once you've finished your movie you can share it on Plotagon's site or export it to YouTube. I couldn't get exporting to YouTube to work even though I successfully connected my YouTube account. In the end I used the RealPlayer Downloader to download my video as an MP4 file so I could upload it to YouTube.

If you have no interest in learning animation software but like to see your scripts bought to life then this may be the tool for you. If you have any pride in your own ability to make a professional looking film then Plotagon will likely disappoint as the compromises will be frustrating to say the least.

It's Story Telling Software but it's definitely not for everyone.


Comments

  1. Hey David,
    Thanks for taking the time to review Plotagon, and sorry to hear you find it lacking. FYI, we're right now hard at work with a major redesign of Plotagon, which addresses some of your issues, but not all.
    Overall, and as you point out in your review, Plotagon is lacking as a pro tool. That is because it was never meant to be one. We pride ourselves on having created a tool that will let anyone *not a filmmaker* create a movie, with a very short learning curve.

    In the new update, we are making some changes to the design that reflects this. The new Plotagon will be faster, more accessible, with better design of the characters and their interactions. And it will work on mobile devices. However, Plotagon will still not be a pro tool. We are contemplating creating one in the future and really appreciate feedback such as this review.

    If you want a preview of what the next version of Plotagon will look like, there is a sneak preview at http://www.launchsiliconvalley.org/digitalmedia/

    Again, thanks for taking the time to make this review.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Thanks Klas for responding to my review. I really appreciate the sneak peak at the new Plotagon. The new interface looks much cleaner (and hopefully more responsive in terms of keeping pace with the writer). Not sure about writing a script on a mobile device but I guess proficient text messagers will be right at home.

      I've never really viewed Plotagon as a professional application. I'm just saying, for someone like me who has some movie making skills, Plotagon in its present form, feels very restrictive. Just being able to choose from a few different camera angles per line of dialogue would be a big improvement.

      I do like the whole idea of a film being created directly from an actual script as it is written. It's such an easy system to learn and has much potential application beyond story telling where producing a video quickly is a priority.

      I'll look forward to the new version and would be happy to do an updated review when it becomes available.

      Delete
  2. Today was the day when Plotagon released the non-beta version. It was a small disappointment that it cannot render videos from scripts created in the Beta version.

    Today's Plotagon version is even more restrictive, giving no control over when to stop music or changing its volume. It does not allow to add pauses either. I hope there will be improvements in these areas in the autumn.

    The user interface needs a bit more streamlining, and when sharing it should mention that YouTube will take its sweet time before making your video visible.

    I think the grail to pursue is a simple Plotagon that does NOT give a lot of freedom in choosing camera angles etc, but having a more advanced level where that can be done, and more importantly giving better control over the timings (duration of actions etc). Adding own audio for speech and sounds was kind of promised, but is not there yet.

    My first try has a dialogue in Swedish, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NYaUck_92BQ
    Swedish works pretty much as badly as expected. Hint to Plotagon: multi-lingual speech synthesis is important - and at least your own language should be supported!

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I've been using the PC version of the new Plotagon and, whilst all the new characters and backgrounds are a big improvement, it still has the same, awful, restrictive, animation interface of the old Plotagon Beta.

      Added to that, it's buggy as hell. Animations don't always play correctly, even in Plotagon's own players on their site.

      I haven't been able to upload my animation to Youtube either. It'll upload the first scene fine but then be corrupted from the second scene onwards.

      I will be posting a review in the coming weeks but I think I'll give them a bit of time to iron out a few of the issues first.

      I would like to see an advanced version with, at the very least, the ability to insert pauses and choose which of the preset camera angles on any given scene you want to use for the next bit of dialogue.

      Delete
  3. I actually find the non beta version a bit of a let down, the actors are too cartoon like the beta was way better the animation had a GTA feel.

    ReplyDelete
  4. wow, what a shitty review of an app that SO MANY LOVE. Mister reviewer, you need to understand that plotagon is made to be EASY to use, for people who want to make up stories and not spend all day making up the angles of the room etc ... This app is A LOT of FUN! it is now 2017 and MANY improvements have been made since your review, but, you need to know that plotagon needs to STAY an easy to use app, that is the whole idea of being an app that is so easy to use that anyone can. You however have reviewed it as a professional film making studio LOL, and that is ridiculous!

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. To be fair the Plotagon I reviewed back in 2014 was a very new concept and looks a lot different to the application of 2017.

      I have the current version installed and, whilst this review is old, the majority of issues that I found problematic still exist in the current version.

      I know Plotagon is not intended to be a professional animation creation tool and I did not review it as such. My conclusion is based on my experience of professional animation software and whether someone like me can live with the limitations of an application designed as a fun tool.

      Personally I don't find it fun to use. There are better applications out there, just as easy to learn that give you far more options beyond dialogue heavy story telling.

      But hey, if you don't know what you don't know, you can't miss, what you never had.

      Delete

Post a Comment

I welcome, read, and respond to genuine comments relating to each post. If your comment isn't that save me some time by not posting it.

Popular posts from this blog

The Ultimate Independent Animator's App and Resource List 2019-2021 - Animation and Video Life

Image created with Cartoon Animator 4. Being an independent animator is not like a studio animation job. There's so much more to do that is indirectly related to the actual task of animating. Over the years I've sought out many apps, tools, and services that can help me achieve that one single task, expressing myself through animation. Below is my Ultimate Independent Animator's Resource List for 2019. It started out as a list of free or low cost apps that could help you in every stage of producing either 2D or 3D animation, and then just kind of grew from there. You may not have been looking for a Time Management App as much as you needed something to get you started in 3D animation but when those commissioned projects start coming in you'll have a head start on maximizing your time. All the apps and services on this list had to meet two main criteria: They had to be useful and relevant to an Indy Animator/artist. The base app/service had to be US$200.0

Make Disney/Pixar Style Characters with Reallusion's Character Creator and Toon Figure Bases

The Extraordinary Tourist Classic Coat outfit created using Reallusion's Toon Designer for CC3. I've talked before how I've wanted to get into 3D Disney/Pixar style character animation since I first saw the animated cutscenes for the very first Tomb Raider game back in 1996. It's why I initially bought Reallusion's iClone 3D studio app as soon as I could afford a computer that would run it. But then Reallusion released their 3D Character Creator (CC) for iClone and I wanted to create my characters with that (and I did try with Bat Storm ). But the focus of CC was realism, even with ToKoMotion's stylised body morphs . Now with Reallusion's Cartoon Designer bundle for CC3 which features two packs, Toon Figures , and Toon Hair , designing Disney/Pixar style 3D characters just got a whole lot quicker. The two packs are the bare essentials for creating Toon style characters. Five body morphs (2 male, 2 female, and one adolescent body morph that w

Three Image Overlay Apps. Do More with Your Reference Images While You Work

PureRef's image overlay in action with Cartoon Animator 4. One thing Cartoon Animator 4 still does not have in stage mode is the ability to onion skin previous and next frames.  For those complete animation newbies among you, onion skinning is the ability to see through the current frame to your previous and/or next keyframes so you can see the progression of your character or object's movement as you create and adjust each keyframe. Usually the previous and next frames appear lighter so your current frame remains the key focus. This prompted me to look for a tool that could overlay an image over my work to use as a reference while still allowing me to work on the app underneath the overlay. I had seen, and even used such apps in the past but it had been some time so I decided to see what was out there, preferably free and/or open source, with versions for Mac and Windows. Overlay 2 There are actually a number of apps that do nothing more than overlay an image but the only one

Artbreeder - Using AI created Character and Background Content in your Animations

A selection of User/AI generated images from Artbreeder. If you're looking for an endless supply of 2D character and background images for your animations then Artbreeder , an online Artificial Intelligence (AI) that generates image mash-ups you can tweak as much as you like, could be the ultimate content library. What is Artbreeder? Artbreeder is free to use though there are various paid plans, that give you additional features, such as higher resolution download images or more settings to play with. All images created on the site are Public Domain (CC0 License) and can be used in commercial projects. Using Artbreeder's online app you can generate head shot portraits, full body characters, landscapes, and other scenes simply by choosing two or more existing images to mash together then, using a series of sliders, to select which traits from each image you wish to lean toward in the final image. Photo Comparison - Top is my original uploaded photo. Bottom is Artbreeder's ap

Run Your Favorite Android Animation Productivity Apps (and Games) on Your PC or Mac with BlueStacks

BlueStacks Android Emulator for PC or Mac. There are many free and low cost mobile animation productivity apps for Android in the Google Play Store that would fit right into your workflow if you could access them directly from your PC/Mac  desktop (or laptop) computer. Even if those apps can save their output to the same cloud storage you use with your PC or Mac, just the divide of using a separate device makes them inconvenient and disruptive. Worse yet, what if your Android device is underpowered for the apps you want to use, or worse still you don't own any Android devices because someone convinced you Apple Mac's, iphones, and ipads are 'cool' (they are, but you pay for 'cool'). BlueStacks is a free, open source Android emulator for Windows or Mac (currently only BlueStacks 4 can be installed on a Mac but BlueStacks 5 for Mac is coming soon). If you're not aware of what an emulator is, it's basically a piece of software that mimics another devices

Stylish Stick Figures for Cartoon Animator 4.2 - New Characters by TET

Stylish Stick Figures by TET. Animating stick figures is almost a right of passage for any animator who has ever made an old fashioned flipbook or discovered the free stickman animator app, Pivot Animator . There's also the hugely popular viral stick figure animation, Animator Versus Animation  and its sequels by Alan Becker that continue to inspire variations more than 12 years later. Back when Vyond was GoAnimate they had a stick figure theme that was popular site wide despite having many other themes with much more refined Saturday morning cartoon style characters. I even had my own stick figure series, Harry Chalk , on GoAnimate. Long story short, I was looking through the Reallusion Cartoon Animator Marketplace and discovered there really weren't any well designed, traditional looking stick figure characters. That's not to say there weren't any at all but I wanted something similar to GoAnimate's stick figures which included full facial features and male and

Review: CrazyTalk Animator 3 vs Moho Studio Pro 12

Reallusion's CrazyTalk Animator 3 or Smith Micro's Moho Studio Pro 12. Which of these 2D animation applications is right for you? Regular readers of this blog will know I'm a strong supporter, and fairly proficient user of CrazyTalk Animator since version 1. It's a great piece of software for producing 2D animations from purchased content quickly and, with version 3, is easier than ever to create animations from your own art. Lesser known is that I first purchased Moho Studio Pro 12 (then known as Anime Studio Pro 9) back in October of 2012 and have been upgrading it to the latest version ever since because I believed in it as an application for creating great 2D animation to TV quality standard. As such, it's a much more complex application than CTA3 that I only got around to learning properly late last year. I'm still in the process of blogging my progress . Despite this I feel I've learned enough of Moho to compare it to CTA3 to help you determ