Skip to main content

Plotagon - Story Telling for Everyone... not really.

Plotagon's Jane
Character.
I've briefly reviewed Plotagon's Animation Tool before as part of my Six DIY Animation tools post and wasn't very impressed. At the time I hadn't really looked very deep into what Plotagon could do. Now that I have had further chance to really explore the software I can safely say that Plotagon will likely be frustrating for anyone with any film training at all.

I say that because, even if you'd had the most basic training in the art of film making, Plotagon is going to frustrate you with it's rigid placement of actors locked camera choices and step by step interpretation of your script.

But let's back up a bit and look at what Plotagon is attempting to do. Plotagon simplifies the film making process by linking what happens in your movie directly to the act of writing your script.

Fig 1. Plotagon Script Interface.
Scripts are set out pretty much in the standard screen writing format. Choose a scene, place up to two characters at any of the predefined locations within the scene and start writing your dialogue. Add character movements, actions and expressions, as well as sound effects and music simply by inserting typical stage directions within your script (see image, Fig 1).

It's a great idea but for an application that runs locally on my computer it's very slow. I'm not the fastest at touch typing but even I can out type the screen cursor by several words. Combine that with having to use the mouse or track pad to select which character is talking and their mood, script writing becomes a slow affair.

Writing could be sped up dramatically, with the flow of ideas left unbroken,` if predictive text was built in to select characters, actions, emotions etc. Pretty much the way dedicated script writing software does. If just this aspect of the software was improved Plotagon would be a really fun tool for story tellers.

On the film making side of things, below is a single scene comedy sketch I wrote, brought to life by Plotagon's 3D actors. Monty Python fans may spot my inspiration as being The Cheese Shop sketch. Unfortunately I don't know as much about coffee as they did about cheese.



As you can see from the video it's not going to win any acting or film making awards but the results are okay given the limitations.

I tried to give the characters appropriate emotions and actions to suit the dialogue. It's not perfect but it kind of works.

What's frustrating though is that for each scene, there are only a handful of locations characters can be placed. If more than one character is in a scene (with a max of two characters per scene) the characters always face each other, even if they're not in the same location.

There is no option to choose camera angles. You're stuck with the supposedly 'professional' film making shots selected by the software based on the action and dialogue. Some of these camera angles are questionable whilst others become repetitive (the over the shoulder shot is definitely over used).

Whilst there are sound effects for actions like opening and closing of doors there are no actual character actions for this. In fact none of the scenes I tried allowed you to have a character exit or enter a scene. It's also very hard to suggest it  'off camera' with a door sound effect because as soon as a character is placed into a scene the camera includes them in most shots.

Videos could easily be improved by giving people more choice on which camera shot they want to use. For example, if I want the camera to frame the non speaking character in a scene to show their reaction to what is being said, then that should be an option.

The limitation of only two characters per scene is also an issue because it makes scenes, such as my coffee shop, appear to be something of a ghost town. In the opening wide shot you'll notice the shop is completely devoid of any other customers.

Plotagon's studio comes with one City theme that includes 5 characters and 6 scenes. You can also purchase additional themes (of which there are presently only four) including Stan Lee's Superheroes, Pride and Prejudice, Alice in Wonderland and a Christmas theme.  Once you've purchased a theme you can mix characters with any themes you already own. There is no ability to import your own scenes, props or characters. You can't customize existing characters either.

The software, at 950MB to download, is far too big for what it does. At that kind of size it should be exceptional but it feels clunky, slow and very much like bloatware. However if it were to be improved so that it performed quicker and in a more streamlined capacity that better suits writers I wouldn't give the download size a second thought.

Once you've finished your movie you can share it on Plotagon's site or export it to YouTube. I couldn't get exporting to YouTube to work even though I successfully connected my YouTube account. In the end I used the RealPlayer Downloader to download my video as an MP4 file so I could upload it to YouTube.

If you have no interest in learning animation software but like to see your scripts bought to life then this may be the tool for you. If you have any pride in your own ability to make a professional looking film then Plotagon will likely disappoint as the compromises will be frustrating to say the least.

It's Story Telling Software but it's definitely not for everyone.


Comments

  1. Hey David,
    Thanks for taking the time to review Plotagon, and sorry to hear you find it lacking. FYI, we're right now hard at work with a major redesign of Plotagon, which addresses some of your issues, but not all.
    Overall, and as you point out in your review, Plotagon is lacking as a pro tool. That is because it was never meant to be one. We pride ourselves on having created a tool that will let anyone *not a filmmaker* create a movie, with a very short learning curve.

    In the new update, we are making some changes to the design that reflects this. The new Plotagon will be faster, more accessible, with better design of the characters and their interactions. And it will work on mobile devices. However, Plotagon will still not be a pro tool. We are contemplating creating one in the future and really appreciate feedback such as this review.

    If you want a preview of what the next version of Plotagon will look like, there is a sneak preview at http://www.launchsiliconvalley.org/digitalmedia/

    Again, thanks for taking the time to make this review.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Thanks Klas for responding to my review. I really appreciate the sneak peak at the new Plotagon. The new interface looks much cleaner (and hopefully more responsive in terms of keeping pace with the writer). Not sure about writing a script on a mobile device but I guess proficient text messagers will be right at home.

      I've never really viewed Plotagon as a professional application. I'm just saying, for someone like me who has some movie making skills, Plotagon in its present form, feels very restrictive. Just being able to choose from a few different camera angles per line of dialogue would be a big improvement.

      I do like the whole idea of a film being created directly from an actual script as it is written. It's such an easy system to learn and has much potential application beyond story telling where producing a video quickly is a priority.

      I'll look forward to the new version and would be happy to do an updated review when it becomes available.

      Delete
  2. Today was the day when Plotagon released the non-beta version. It was a small disappointment that it cannot render videos from scripts created in the Beta version.

    Today's Plotagon version is even more restrictive, giving no control over when to stop music or changing its volume. It does not allow to add pauses either. I hope there will be improvements in these areas in the autumn.

    The user interface needs a bit more streamlining, and when sharing it should mention that YouTube will take its sweet time before making your video visible.

    I think the grail to pursue is a simple Plotagon that does NOT give a lot of freedom in choosing camera angles etc, but having a more advanced level where that can be done, and more importantly giving better control over the timings (duration of actions etc). Adding own audio for speech and sounds was kind of promised, but is not there yet.

    My first try has a dialogue in Swedish, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NYaUck_92BQ
    Swedish works pretty much as badly as expected. Hint to Plotagon: multi-lingual speech synthesis is important - and at least your own language should be supported!

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I've been using the PC version of the new Plotagon and, whilst all the new characters and backgrounds are a big improvement, it still has the same, awful, restrictive, animation interface of the old Plotagon Beta.

      Added to that, it's buggy as hell. Animations don't always play correctly, even in Plotagon's own players on their site.

      I haven't been able to upload my animation to Youtube either. It'll upload the first scene fine but then be corrupted from the second scene onwards.

      I will be posting a review in the coming weeks but I think I'll give them a bit of time to iron out a few of the issues first.

      I would like to see an advanced version with, at the very least, the ability to insert pauses and choose which of the preset camera angles on any given scene you want to use for the next bit of dialogue.

      Delete
  3. I actually find the non beta version a bit of a let down, the actors are too cartoon like the beta was way better the animation had a GTA feel.

    ReplyDelete
  4. wow, what a shitty review of an app that SO MANY LOVE. Mister reviewer, you need to understand that plotagon is made to be EASY to use, for people who want to make up stories and not spend all day making up the angles of the room etc ... This app is A LOT of FUN! it is now 2017 and MANY improvements have been made since your review, but, you need to know that plotagon needs to STAY an easy to use app, that is the whole idea of being an app that is so easy to use that anyone can. You however have reviewed it as a professional film making studio LOL, and that is ridiculous!

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. To be fair the Plotagon I reviewed back in 2014 was a very new concept and looks a lot different to the application of 2017.

      I have the current version installed and, whilst this review is old, the majority of issues that I found problematic still exist in the current version.

      I know Plotagon is not intended to be a professional animation creation tool and I did not review it as such. My conclusion is based on my experience of professional animation software and whether someone like me can live with the limitations of an application designed as a fun tool.

      Personally I don't find it fun to use. There are better applications out there, just as easy to learn that give you far more options beyond dialogue heavy story telling.

      But hey, if you don't know what you don't know, you can't miss, what you never had.

      Delete

Post a Comment

Related Posts with Thumbnails

Buy Gifts and Apparel featuring art by TET
20% off holiday gifts yule (and they’ll) love. Use code ROAR

Popular posts from this blog

Eric W. Schwartz: Cartoonist, Animator and Amiga Die Hard

American Cartoonist, Eric W. Schwartz, (whose unofficial Amiga Icon, Amy the Squirrel, is pictured on the July 92 edition of CU Amiga cover on the right) is my only real animation hero. Sure there are the big names like Disney, Chuck Jones, Tex Avery and even Preston Blair whose influences can all be seen in my own cartoons but Eric did what none of the others could. He showed that really great 2D computer animation was within my reach with little more than an Amiga Computer, a copy of Deluxe Paint and Moviesetter.

This was at a time when computer based animation was in its infancy (outside of computer game animation) and Flash was something that lights did.

There were many great Amiga artists but Eric was really the only one consistently making very funny, traditional style animations. His humor and drawing style is heavily influenced by classic Warner Brothers and Disney cartoons but he managed to build on this, creating something that was recognizably Eric's own style.

I've…

Review: CrazyTalk Animator 3 vs Moho Studio Pro 12

Reallusion's CrazyTalk Animator 3 or Smith Micro's Moho Studio Pro 12. Which of these 2D animation applications is right for you?

Regular readers of this blog will know I'm a strong supporter, and fairly proficient user of CrazyTalk Animator since version 1. It's a great piece of software for producing 2D animations from purchased content quickly and, with version 3, is easier than ever to create animations from your own art.

Lesser known is that I first purchased Moho Studio Pro 12 (then known as Anime Studio Pro 9) back in October of 2012 and have been upgrading it to the latest version ever since because I believed in it as an application for creating great 2D animation to TV quality standard. As such, it's a much more complex application than CTA3 that I only got around to learning properly late last year. I'm still in the process of blogging my progress.

Despite this I feel I've learned enough of Moho to compare it to CTA3 to help you determine which …

Springboard - Fast Digital Storyboarding on a Budget

Storyboarding an animation is one of my least favorite parts of the creative process and yet it's also one of the most important after writing the script. It's where the planning of the visual representation of the script takes place.

The Problem....

I've struggled with storyboarding because I knew there had to be a better way than drawing tiny thumbnails on a sheet of paper with script and camera direction notes crammed underneath - an example of which can be found in my post for my music video animation, Yoshimi Battles the Pink Robots. This method isn't exactly client friendly as my handwriting scrawls can become unreadable even to me over time.

The other technique I employed was using the storyboarding features of Celtx Script Writing Software. Celtx allows you to import your scanned thumbnails (or any digital image) into its storyboard where you can add text and camera direction into scrollable text boxes below each image - and never run out of room. I employed th…

Review: Reallusion's CrazyTalk Animator 3 - Taking a Step Back to Move Forward

CrazyTalk Animator 3's bold claim is 'The One-for-all 2D Animation'. Does it deliver? Could it be your 'go to' 2D animation tool of choice? Before I explore those questions I feel a bit of backstory is necessary.

I've been using Reallusion's CrazyTalk Animator since its original incarnation that promised quick and easy, 2D animation creation. An idea that was relative depending on what kind of animation you wanted to do. Since my focus has largely been on original character animation my experience with CTA is relative to that.

If you wanted to create animated characters from your original artwork, quick and easy didn't really describe the time and effort involved. There was a lot of preparation and considerable time spent rigging its G1 characters.

Voice All Your Own Animated Characters with Voice Changer

Voice Changer by AVSoft is real time voice manipulation software that can be used for a wide range of purposes including (according to their website); Voice-over and voice dubbing for audio/video clips, presentations, narrations, voice messages, voice mails, E-greeting cards, broadcasting, etc.; mimic the voice of any person, create animal sounds, change/replace/remove voices in songs, videos,etc.

I bought it for the specific purpose of changing my own voice, to extend my vocal range, for voicing characters in my own animations.
I was fortunate enough to get this software at a significant discount that made it difficult to refuse, given that I'd never tried it, or even heard of it before. I'm not sure if I would have bought it at the full price given that much of what it can do (for my needs) can also be done with the freeware audio program, Audacity.
Voice Changer is relatively easy to install and set up. Once installed simply change you default microphone to the installed AV…

Animation 4 Business iClone Promotional Video

In my recent updates I've been teasing a new Animation 4 Business Promotional video created with Reallusion's iClone 6. It's taken me longer than expected because I've only been able to work on it for a couple of hours each day - part of my new schedule that enables me to work on many projects concurrently.

Finally the animation is finished and, although I've already debuted it on the Animation 4 Business website, Facebook and YouTube, here is the only place you can read about the behind the scenes creation process.

WeVideo - Professional, Collaborative, Online Video Editor for Free

WeVideo is a professional online, cloud, video editing and project sharing application that works right in your browser. It attempts to compete with equivalent licensed software that you can buy for your computer, such as (in my case) MAGIX Movie Edit Pro.

WeVideo is free for personal use and comes with a range of paid plans that give you more features and benefits depending on your needs and how much you want to spend. Check out their video below which gives a great overview of WeVideo's service.



In this review I'm going to see if I can use WeVideo to create a typical video for my main YouTube channel, etourist2, where I mostly upload art and animation demonstration/tutorial videos. Before we start, here's a run down of what a free account offers:

1 GB storage360p resolution15 export minutes per monthExport to Facebook, YouTube, Vimeo and Twitter5 invites per project390 licensed music titles
With only 1GB of storage this account is clearly targeted at short form video and …